Awaisi
03-09-2004, 03:38 AM
Sallam,
There are some interesting issues brought to light in this letter, such as the tussle between V. Admiral Choudari and Ayub Khan and also Quaid Azam's vision about Pakistan Navy.
http://www.dawn.com/2004/03/09/letted.htm
Vice-Admiral Choudri
This has reference to Mr M. H. Askari's article on Vice-Admiral Choudri (February 29).
I would like to correct two points in that article. First, the admiral did not specialize in gunnery. He was a torpedo and anti-submarine specialist. Second, the first Indian to be commissioned in the Royal Indian Navy was not a Parsi. He was Sub-Lieutenant D. N. Mukerji, an engineer from Bihar. He rose to the rank of captain and took premature retirement from service in 1950.
Admiral Choudri had to resign because he opposed General Ayub Khan's attempts to hinder the expansion of the navy. Even the Quaid-i-Azam had visualized a strong navy for Pakistan.
Very few people know that when the subcontinent was being partitioned, Mr Jinnah made serious attempts to acquire the islands of Andaman and Nicobar in the Bay of Bengal as part of Pakistan.
So astute was his vision that even before partition, he realized the importance of a navy and these islands as a link between the two wings of Pakistan. Unfortunately, General Ayub did not understand either the maritime compulsions of Pakistan or the importance of a navy. He was sea-blind.
There was a longstanding background of differences between Vice-Admiral Choudri and General Ayub Khan, dating back to the time when as head of the navy, then the senior service, the latter insisted upon being regarded as senior in protocol among the three services chiefs.
The general tried, as army commander, to become supreme commander of the armed forces. His plans were thwarted by the admiral. The general was persistently opposed to the navy's plan for acquisition of a cruiser and, at meetings and otherwise, expressed himself strongly in favour of maximum resources being directed to the development of the army and the air force, with the navy's plan being relegated to a lower priority.
The two could not sail in the same boat. While the admiral was a professional sailor devoted exclusively to the fledgling navy, the general was a scheming manipulator for whom power became an end in itself. The admiral resigned in disgust.
KHALID WASAY
There are some interesting issues brought to light in this letter, such as the tussle between V. Admiral Choudari and Ayub Khan and also Quaid Azam's vision about Pakistan Navy.
http://www.dawn.com/2004/03/09/letted.htm
Vice-Admiral Choudri
This has reference to Mr M. H. Askari's article on Vice-Admiral Choudri (February 29).
I would like to correct two points in that article. First, the admiral did not specialize in gunnery. He was a torpedo and anti-submarine specialist. Second, the first Indian to be commissioned in the Royal Indian Navy was not a Parsi. He was Sub-Lieutenant D. N. Mukerji, an engineer from Bihar. He rose to the rank of captain and took premature retirement from service in 1950.
Admiral Choudri had to resign because he opposed General Ayub Khan's attempts to hinder the expansion of the navy. Even the Quaid-i-Azam had visualized a strong navy for Pakistan.
Very few people know that when the subcontinent was being partitioned, Mr Jinnah made serious attempts to acquire the islands of Andaman and Nicobar in the Bay of Bengal as part of Pakistan.
So astute was his vision that even before partition, he realized the importance of a navy and these islands as a link between the two wings of Pakistan. Unfortunately, General Ayub did not understand either the maritime compulsions of Pakistan or the importance of a navy. He was sea-blind.
There was a longstanding background of differences between Vice-Admiral Choudri and General Ayub Khan, dating back to the time when as head of the navy, then the senior service, the latter insisted upon being regarded as senior in protocol among the three services chiefs.
The general tried, as army commander, to become supreme commander of the armed forces. His plans were thwarted by the admiral. The general was persistently opposed to the navy's plan for acquisition of a cruiser and, at meetings and otherwise, expressed himself strongly in favour of maximum resources being directed to the development of the army and the air force, with the navy's plan being relegated to a lower priority.
The two could not sail in the same boat. While the admiral was a professional sailor devoted exclusively to the fledgling navy, the general was a scheming manipulator for whom power became an end in itself. The admiral resigned in disgust.
KHALID WASAY